Monday, September 23, 2013

judges asked the government to provide detailed evidence on which you want the right to decide the drag data using terror laws

The High Court gave the government until Tuesday to provide detailed information about why you want the right to lead evidence and share data using the laws of terror seized the partner a Guardian journalist.

Lord Justice Beatson and Judge Kenneth Parker said in a statement outlining his decision to allow the police to continue for access Miranda decision was taken because, although they could not judge the strength of government statements on the risks to national security that the material would pose if released, had "serious allegations of those responsible."

Miranda

partner, Glenn Greenwald, revealed mass digital surveillance by intelligence agencies of the United States and the United Kingdom on the basis of the filtrate by Edward Snowden, a former U.S. intelligence contractor. Miranda was traveling from Berlin to his home in Rio de Janeiro, where he was arrested at Heathrow on Sunday.

police lawyers and the government of the city so far claimed the Miranda data entered include "highly sensitive material" and "tens of thousands of highly confidential documents in the British intelligence whose unauthorized disclosure authorized could threaten national security or death. "But the details were limited.

The judges said that the lack of evidence of the authorities was understandable given the rapidly changing event, but had been "a problem." They said that the protection of journalistic sources and the protection of national security interests were competing, but "the public interest in the investigation, detection and prosecution of those reasonably suspected terrorists," explained its decision to allow Police learned the material.

Thursday, the judges ruled that the police can not keep Miranda data until next Friday but added that only authorized to examine the data in the context of the protection of national security or Miranda to investigate whether he was involved in terrorism. The judges also said that the data can not be used as part of a criminal investigation.

A full hearing is scheduled for next Friday, which will set out how the government is able to use long-term data.

The detailed judgment also provided more clues about what the British authorities can be doing with the data. Government lawyers told the court that under the Terrorism Act 2008 "once the material has been legally obtained under the schedule 7, may be disclosed to the intelligence services which can then be used to its statutory objectives."


freedom, civil liberties groups and human rights, asked to formally intervene in the judicial review scheduled this fall on the legality of the arrest of Miranda and the seizure of their equipment. In a letter to the Court, said it was "a matter of grave concern that the power has directly attacked a member of the immediate family of a prominent journalist in a way that seems to be a direct attempt to interfere with press freedom. "

Joel Simon, executive director of the New York Committee to Protect Journalists this week wrote to David Cameron complained Miranda detention was "not in line with the historic commitment of the United Kingdom to freedom of the press. "

Thorbjorn Jagland, Secretary General of the Council of Europe, wrote to the Minister of Interior, Theresa May, on the arrest of Miranda and the destruction of the teams at the request of the authorities of the United Kingdom.
Find best price for : --David----Edward----Glenn----Miranda--

Wednesday, September 18, 2013

Why

scandal and monitoring Edward Snowden was so limited? Is that the public does not care?

At a wedding last week, I sat next to a novelist who writes about the Cold War, so I told him the story of how the Secret Intelligence Service thanked all agents in Germany after the fall of the Berlin Wall. It is a moving story of another time and I know it's true.

In Germany approached unification payments authorized by the Government of His Majesty is - I think - DM 30,000 (€ 10,200) for all agents who risked their lives and freedom to help MI6. A team of intelligence agents deployed to locate former employees or their families, and to present the check to the gratitude of the government. It was a long and emotional young officers heard many harrowing stories of loss, sacrifice and last year in prison.

Finally, there was one person left on the list. He came to the office of MI6 in the main street Unter den Linden in the former East Berlin, but instead of taking the money, he ran into the street, followed by spies under control. He rejected a second time, gesticulating wildly to the Brandenburg Gate. Does not understand that the British government had anything to make their children could walk to the door as free citizens do? This captures a lot of times that formed my political beliefs, as well as the miracle of liberation in 1989. During the Cold War, the value of freedom and privacy because we compare our lives to the oppressive conditions in the communist bloc. Whatever the shortcomings of Western societies, we knew we were better than these companies and we knew we were right.

history has played on my mind recently, because all summer, I thought the lack of reaction in Britain to the revelations about Snowden U.S. and United Kingdom interception, a lack which has sometimes seemed more remarkable than their own revelations. Now, apparently, we are comfortable with a system of almost total intrusion have horrified all British adults for 25 years. At that time, Western spies have recognized the importance of freedom of meeting survivors of these networks, and now his own people to spy 'have changed, obviously, and to be honest, I wonder if I, and others who are concerned about the privacy and freedom left behind by companies accept surveillance as part of the sophisticated world in which we live in. Even so, the forgetting of history by the British press Snowden seems remarkable.

Last Friday, the order

Today Letter program 8am, usually a reliable indicator of changes in the home and abroad, was as follows.

Putin stands firm on Syria at the G8.

Blair

Syrian response. The fate of Syrian refugees. regulator controls nursing requires nurses. Former BBC Trust BBC DG accused of dishonesty. A telephone recording of the Spanish rail recent fall. Parliamentary Commission officials accused of incompetence. China has discovered that many Chinese can not speak Mandarin properly. Water Rats in the UK are falling drastically

Not a mention of the story that takes two of the most influential newspapers in the world - the

the BBC seems shy and subject to the authority it has for decades, it is surprising that journalists do not understand the huge implications of this story. They obeyed requests from governments that do not use? Or do you not know, because it seemed important? Whatever the answer, we can have the slightest doubt that it was journalistic irresponsibility of society to recognize these important revelations in an element down your web pages.
Today

plays an important role in the establishment of the daily program, but in regard to the program, there was this important story. This gives relief to newspapers also ignore the revelations, almost certainly, at the request of the government.


The BBC may have succumbed to the cold that surrounds the history of Snowden. Three weeks ago, after the partner of one of the first journalists who write about the Snowden
Guardian
was arrested at Heathrow terrorist laws, I four or five interviews with the BBC. In addition, the interviewer simply shows a remarkable lack of knowledge on the subject Snowden, lasted more than two months, but a kind of reserve or scruple to discuss these questions in the air. It is difficult to put your finger on, but that's what I feel like a thrill.


Find best price for : --Snowden--

Saturday, August 24, 2013
unlockpattern
Wednesday, August 14, 2013
Monday, August 12, 2013

control agreement ending 80 years the role of the Graham family, who directed the message to national prominence

The Washington Post sold to Jeff Bezos, founder of Amazon distribution giant, in a move that surprised even seasoned observers of the crisis in the industry of the American press.

The agreement to sell one of the legendary titles in American newspapers control late 80 years, the role of the Graham family, who ran the message through journalism brand as Watergate national prominence in 1972. The deal was done in such secrecy that even the very stability of investigative journalists post were taken by surprise when the newspaper published on its website a report on the transfer.

"This is absolutely amazing news," commentator Jim Romenesko told the Guardian. "Equally surprising is that it does not leak in a building full of investigative journalists."

According to the story the message itself, the initiative for the sale of the family is from Graham and Bezos. Donald Graham, CEO of Washington Post Co., which currently holds the title, use an investment firm to address six "contenders" amid tight security before choosing Bezos.

The sale price was set at $ 250 million, a relatively modest sum for such a legendary institution - 1% of the huge personal wealth by Bloomberg Bezos has made $ 22 billion. The figure elegantly reflects the dire economic situation of most of the best stories in the news in the United States, coming as it does just days after the sale of the Boston Globe by The New York Times Co with Red Sox owner John Henry for a more lean $ 70 million.

Graham said his own newspaper, after four generations of the family property, "all members of my family have started with the same excitement - download -., Even thinking about selling the post office, but when the idea of ??a transaction with Jeff Bezos came, my feelings changed. "

Graham added: ".. The message could survive under the ownership of the company and has been profitable for the foreseeable future, but I wanted to do more than survive"


the sale was a complete surprise to most Correos, and surprised the world of American media. "All this happened with the admirable and surprising secret," said Jeff Jarvis, a journalism professor at the University Graduate School of Journalism in New York City.

Jarvis expressed reservations about the post is held by CEO of Amazon, relatively reserved. "Bezos does not believe in openness. And that worries me. Both the performance of a newspaper, how an institution of Washington and operates the need for experimental business model to produce outdoor good for the entire industry. "


Find best price for : --Guardian----Atlantic----company----Hathaway----Berkshire----Warren----Jarvis----Amazon----Katharine----Bezos----Bloomberg----Romenesko----Watergate----Washington----Post----Graham--

CreepyDOL is a new personal tracking system that allows a user to track, locate, and break...



Brendan O'Connor is a blatant hacker who worked for DARPA and taught in the U.S. military cybersecurity. CreepyDOL (Distributed Object Creepy Locator), the new system of personal monitoring, allowing users to track, locate and enter the smartphone of an individual. "For a few hundred dollars," he said, "I can not track your every move, activity and interaction, until you find what it is for you to sing." .. Continue reading system can destroy your privacy CreepyDOL approximately U.S. $ 500


Section:
telecommunications
  • Tags:
  • Hack, privacy, Raspberry Pi, security, surveillance, Wifi, Wireless

Find best price for : --CreepyDOL----DARPA--
Tuesday, August 6, 2013

small-scale agriculture is essential to feed the Africans, not expensive stem cell burger cooked on a lab West

Sergey Brin, the billionaire co-founder of Google U.S. pays a Dutch scientist to develop a burger extracted from cow muscle stem cells. They are grown with chemicals that promote growth to help grow and multiply, and the global television event designed by a company of international marketing, the resulting € 250,000 (€ 216,000) burger is presented as a triumph Science and ethics in order to feed a future global population of 9 billion people, most of whom are born in developing countries. London The general consensus is that science has a moral obligation to support this type of research.

But the question should be why the rich countries want to strengthen their industrialized food system in developing countries?

most of Africa and Asia used to be self-sufficient in food, but in the last 30 years, almost all developing countries became dependent on imports. Western cultures have been thrown Wholesale subsidized crops undermine local food production, trade barriers were removed to enable the EU and the USA to improve the export of crops, the plans have been undermined and changed, food aid was sent in large quantities, and now Great Britain and the United States want genetically modified food grown in all countries

Maybe in 10 years, after billions of dollars have been spent on expansion and improvement of in vitro meat, poor countries must provide "Googleburgers" or, as they are called, " Frankenburgers "in the name of the feed and protect their environment.

A very diversified technology food and agricultural research came last week Kanayo Nwanze, President of IFAD, the only UN agency with a specific mandate to work for the poor. The opening of the Forum for Agricultural Research in Africa in Accra, Ghana, who did not speak or Hamburger tech needs of agriculture mega-scale provided by some governments and companies "land grabbing".


But Nwanze was looking to the future. "Agriculture is the key to Africa's development, and development is the key to a future in which Africa is not just the food itself, but the power of the world must change the position Research and development is to research for development. This means measuring our results not only increased yields, but reducing poverty, improving nutrition and health of ecosystems cohesive societies. Finally, it must be inclusive. "


Find best price for : --Africa----Nwanze----Kanayo----Asia--